Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:11
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Why do North Indians, living in Bangalore, not bother to learn Kannada?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Heart Disease: What You Eat Matters More Than Cutting Carbs, Fat - Healthline
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Japanese queue for hours as rice shortage deepens - Financial Times
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Gold Holds Decline After US Jobs Data Deters Demand for Havens - Bloomberg
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why upsc is considered the toughest exam in the whole world?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.